Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 10 results ...

Chua, D K and Godinot, M (2006) Use of a WBS Matrix to Improve Interface Management in Projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 67–79.

Fan, S and Tserng, H P (2006) Object-Oriented Scheduling for Repetitive Projects with Soft Logics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 35–48.

Hegazy, T (2006) Computerized System for Efficient Delivery of Infrastructure Maintenance/Repair Programs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 26–34.

Lee, D and Arditi, D (2006) Total Quality Performance of Design/Build Firms Using Quality Function Deployment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 49–57.

Lee, D and Shi, J J (2006) Construction Business Automation System. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 88–96.

Nitithamyong, P and Skibniewski, M J (2006) Success/Failure Factors and Performance Measures of Web-Based Construction Project Management Systems: Professionals’ Viewpoint. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 80–87.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Construction management; Information systems; Information technology (IT); Internet; Information management;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0733-9364
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2006)132:1(80)
  • Abstract:
    This paper presents the results of an empirical study conducted to refine the writers’ previous findings on potential factors that may influence performance of commercial Web-based project management systems (WPMSs) and potential measures that might be used to assess performance of such systems. Data used in this study were obtained from 39 professionals who had practical experience with WPMSs in construction projects. The results of the study confirm 42 factors that can potentially affect performance of WPMSs and 36 measures that can be used to evaluate such performance. These 42 factors are categorized into four distinct groups: characteristics of the project, the project team, the service provider, and the specific WPMS system used in the project. The 36 measures reflect performance of WPMSs in six different perspectives: strategic, schedule/time, cost, quality, risk, and communication. Findings presented in this paper can be used by researchers as a starting point for future research in the area of WPMS implementation and performance evaluation and may be used by practitioners in the industry as a useful guide to increase the likelihood of a successful WPMS adoption.

Oyetunji, A A and Anderson, S D (2006) Relative Effectiveness of Project Delivery and Contract Strategies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 3–13.

Randolph Thomas, H and Horman, M J (2006) Fundamental Principles of Workforce Management. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 97–104.

Vanhoucke, M (2006) Work Continuity Constraints in Project Scheduling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 14–25.

Yang, M, Chen, S and Chen, S (2006) Innovative Central Opening Strut System for Foundation Excavation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 132(01), 58–66.